Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ArchLabs


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:00, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

ArchLabs

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

It does not have notability and reliable sources. Editor-1 (talk) 04:53, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Mark the trainDiscuss 05:45, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Mark the trainDiscuss 05:45, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:11, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep Articles in Insider, It's FOSS, and StationX'' are significant coverage in indepedent, reliable sources and so passes WP:GNG. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 01:34, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep Unfortunately the article itself has the wrong sources, so to speak, but those above indicate that the subject passes GNG. My name is not dave (talk/contribs) 11:38, 16 October 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.