Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Archaeology and animation


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America1000 02:25, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

Archaeology and animation

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Per WP:NOTESSAY. Essentially a collection personal critiques of depictions of archaeology in popular media by the primary author. I don't think it's salvageable: in theory, something like this could exist as a subarticle of Archaeology, but the current content is subjective, specific to particular works, and almost entirely without references. Joe Roe (talk) 14:38, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. North America1000 20:56, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. North America1000 20:56, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. North America1000 20:56, 15 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete This is an essay, pure and simple.  freshacconci  talk to me  21:26, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete or possible merge as above. Does not rise above a High School essay. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:50, 15 July 2016 (UTC).
 * Delete as journal material, still nothing actually convincing for an article. SwisterTwister   talk  23:51, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete While it may be possible to create an article about the use of (computer) animation in archaeology, the indiscriminate collection of examples used here and the essay form make it not salvageable. Mduvekot (talk) 12:52, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete, does not meet WP:GNG, is an essay with a lot of WP:OR. Coolabahapple (talk) 16:04, 22 July 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.