Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Archeology (band)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Lankiveil (speak to me) 12:10, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

Archeology (band)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

One album on a local label, a couple of additional singles and a minor tour does not pass WP:MUSIC. Add to the fact that their MySpace and Facebook pages are not upto date, and their website ArcheologyMusic.com is laid-up at GoDaddy, and it all adds up to a spun advert article for a non-notable band - Rgds, Trident13 (talk) 20:49, 26 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete&mdash;just another one of those bands... fails WP:N; there just aren't enough reliable sources that comment on the act. — WP: PENGUIN  · [ TALK ]  23:45, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Oregon-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:43, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:43, 27 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J04n(talk page) 01:19, 6 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete, non notable band, definitely fails WP:NBAND. Revolution1221 (talk) 01:23, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Weak delete. I'm seeing bits of coverage around, including brief write-ups tied to upcoming concert appearances (e.g., ) and an interview with Filter magazine . Seems too weak on the whole, however; not convinced there's enough to meet WP:BAND.  Gong   show  02:24, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.