Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Archibus


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  04:44, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

Archibus

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:NPRODUCT and WP:NOTADVERT. Sources in article are non-reliable (self-published) or press releases. Potential sources are similar press releases and are also not reliable, and thus don't indicate notability; others are simply not WP:RS. Article currently seems to serve as a advertisement of the company's services ("made a strategic growth investment", product catalogue). Searches for other sources are only of one-word passing mentions (such as "software like Archibus,, , etc.") and do not contain any significant coverage. WhoAteMyButter ( 🏔️talk │ ❄️contribs ) 04:59, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business, Companies,  and Products.  WhoAteMyButter  ( 🏔️talk │ ❄️contribs ) 04:59, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  05:13, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete fails to meet the basic criteria for GNG, not sufficient sourcing Old-AgedKid (talk) 13:26, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete. Can't find a source with significant coverage that is not PR. popo dameron  ⁠ talk  17:00, 1 March 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.