Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Archimedes Gallery


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 07:12, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

Archimedes Gallery

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable gallery lacking non-trivial support. red dogsix (talk) 01:34, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete (A7). No credible claim for notability, no sources. --Randykitty (talk) 08:53, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 09:43, 28 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete: I am surprised the speedy deletion was declined, as nothing in the article text does more than assert it exists, with an uncited name-list of exhibitors. My own searches are finding nothing (even, for example, any exhibition reviews in noted journals, though AfD discussions on galleries then tend to encounter WP:NOTINHERITED problems) that could indicate encyclopaedic notability. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH, WP:GNG. AllyD (talk) 09:51, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete: Per nomination. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 11:10, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - per nomination, article fails to identify notability, and a search on google news on returned one good hit which was insufficient to establish the missing notability. Mr rnddude (talk) 00:54, 3 July 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.