Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Architeam


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 01:11, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

Architeam

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No evidence could be found that this is a notable organisation. There are many other organisations with the same name, and e.g. the Architeam awards are not from this organisation. Fram (talk) 12:17, 8 September 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:06, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 20:20, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 20:20, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete Per nom's points, fails WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:MILL.--SamHolt6 (talk) 04:20, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:48, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete False positives aside, there are no WP:RS for this organization. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 17:11, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - Can not find enough in-depth sourcing about this particular organization of this name.  Onel 5969  TT me 20:22, 30 September 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.