Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Archivarix CMS


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 04:41, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

Archivarix CMS

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No evidence of notability of this CMS that was released two days ago. Possible COI issue. Fails WP:GNG for lack of independent sources. - MrX 🖋 13:06, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.  ~Ruyaba~   {talk}  13:19, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  ~Ruyaba~   {talk}  13:19, 13 February 2019 (UTC)


 * This CMS was released in 2017 https://trends.google.comand it has a unique purpose - to manage websites restored from the Internet archive.DavidArchiv (talk) 14:59, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 18:54, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Atlantic306 (talk) 20:45, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. Can find no evidence of notability. Also, agree that there's an evident COI issue. Colin M (talk) 22:34, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete as unambiguous WP:PROMO. Additionally, I encourage the article creator with "Archiv" in their name to disclose any connection to the company, following any appropriate instructions at WP:PAYDISCLOSE. Bakazaka (talk) 21:27, 27 February 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.