Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arcola Lake Elementary School


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was NO CONSENSUS. -Splash talk 01:06, 1 October 2005 (UTC)

Arcola Lake Elementary School
Non notable elementary school. Dismas|(talk) 06:33, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
 * delete for reasons above. Pete.Hurd 06:43, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge this and the other stub articles on Miami schools to a Elementary schools of the Miami-Dade Public Schools system. Local notability only. Sjakkalle (Check!)  06:45, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep per Schools/Arguments. Kappa 06:54, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete all non-notable elementary schools. TheMadBaron 12:48, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per Schools/Arguments--Isotope23 13:57, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. smelly poo. Dunc|&#9786; 14:22, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, utterly nn Proto t c 15:06, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep --Vsion 15:43, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Schools are no more notable than apartment buildings. Bunchofgrapes 18:43, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep as explained above for reasons articulated in Schools/Arguments. Silensor 19:12, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. No basis for deletion. Christopher Parham (talk) 19:38, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep Bad faith mass nomination.--Nicodemus75 15:32, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
 * And not bad faith for the mass creation? Don't know why all of these are being created, but I hope it is not bad faith on the part of the creator.  Vegaswikian 05:59, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
 * keep This sort of thing is lamentatable. CalJW 21:54, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, schools are notable, bad faith mass nomination - Wikipedia is not paper. Who gave Dismas his janitorial barnstar??? Unwarranted time wasting effort to remove all elementary and middle schools from Wikipedia. KillerChihuahua 23:22, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, schools are not inherently notable. Lord Bob 00:52, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete All Elementary Schools --Aranda56 01:34, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete non notable G Clark 01:38, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete another nameless, faceless cookie-cutter school. If this article were about a person, it would have been speedied. Denni &#9775;  02:11, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep article about verifiable public institution and censure nominator for disrupting Wikipedia to prove a point. --Gene_poole 04:10, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Yet another school. --Calton | Talk 04:17, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Its that simple.  Vegaswikian 05:57, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. No notability established. - A Man In Black (Talk | Contribs) 06:58, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep - see every other school page nominated by Dismas for reason. -Parallel or Together? 07:37, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
 * delete -- red stucco 09:17, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete: non-notable grade school. Jonathunder 19:12, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
 * keep please all these schools should not be mass listed like this Yuckfoo 01:39, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
 * And why not? If they are all examples of a spectacular waste of space, then I see no reason they should not be nominated en masse. It means more work for voters, pro or con, but I think it is high time the whole "school, therefore notable" argument got another serious look. Denni &#9775; 00:44, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Yes, please take a serious look at that argument and stop wasting our time with WP:POINT-making. Kappa 01:00, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, no assertion of being worthy of an article.Gateman1997 20:54, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Lovely article.  -Tony Sidaway Talk  01:02, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep schools. ··gracefool |&#9786; 19:02, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep per Schools/Arguments. Well written, formatted and referenced stub.  We should be encouraging this type of participation.    Un  focused  21:38, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.