Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arcomage tribute


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. bainer (talk) 09:27, 22 December 2005 (UTC)

Arcomage tribute
Article on obscure fan-tribute software which is still being developed. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball Mecanismo | Talk 02:09, 16 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete: per nom. RENTASTRAWBERRY   FOR LET?   röck  02:14, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Jasmol 03:24, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, will probably become verifiable soon enough when their demonstration becomes available. Wikipedia doesn't need notability requirements. &mdash;Simetrical (talk) 04:35, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment Wikipedia is not a crystal ball --Mecanismo | Talk 13:06, 16 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete as per nom. ManoaChild 05:34, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, recreate after release if notable.--SarekOfVulcan 09:44, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not yet verifiable, so does not deserve article yet. Is also promoting the game. - Mgm|(talk) 12:34, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete because it is not verifiable now and is unliklely to be anything other than indiscriminate collecting of information in the future. Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] AfD? 15:19, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Until published, it's vapourware. Ifnord 20:37, 16 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.