Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arctic Cape


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Keep, nom withdrawn. ''I take this edit and particularly this edit as a withdrawal. Note to nominators, the usual way to withdraw a nomination is to add a comment "Nomination withdrawn" or words to that effect, sometimes striking the original nomination statement, and sometimes giving the reason for the withdrawal. Then the AfD is closed and archived normally. This can be relevant if the page is later re-nominated for AfD. Also, it would be helpful if the reference cited in this discussion were added to the article.'' DES (talk) 16:34, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

Arctic Cape
This cape does not exist. The northernmost cape called Cape Molotov (мыс Молотова). Advisorspeak en-2 05:54, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep. You may have a naming issue, but that's not a reason to delete nor is it for discussion at AfD.  Also, allow me to quote from William James Mills, Exploring Polar Frontiers:  A Historical Encyclopedia, Vol. 2:  "Ushakov and his two companions explored the west coast of the large central island—October Revolution—before crossing a strait to Komsomolets Island and sledging to the northernmost point of the archipelago.  This is now known as Arctic Cape, though Ushakov originally named it for the later disgraced politician Vyechyslav Molotov."   Glenfarclas   ( talk ) 06:14, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment: While I was typing the above reply, the nominator tagged this page db-author.  Since there's now substantial comment by another author (sorry) I've removed the speedy deletion tag, but suggest speedy close as a withdrawn nomination.   Glenfarclas   ( talk ) 06:18, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
 * This project page was blanked, tagged for deletion, and then deleted for having no content, but I asked the deleting admin to restore it because I feel this AfD should be closed properly. The nomination has clearly been withdrawn, but for reasons including the possibility of a subsequent deletion nomination of the article it's not right to simply vanish the AfD.   Glenfarclas   ( talk ) 11:22, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.