Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arctic Spas


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. postdlf (talk) 23:18, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

Arctic Spas

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

While the company has won some awards it is way below the level of what Wikipedia should have for companies. WP is not the business pages, it is not a business directory and we are giving the company unfair commercial advantage. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 19:59, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete not notable. --Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 01:01, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment - Is your !vote based upon source searches? I found several simply by clicking on the Google News link above, some of which I've included in my !vote below. There are also many sources listed in the references section of the article; did you see those? Northamerica1000(talk) 07:43, 12 December 2012 (UTC)
 * I saw them of course. I am just not getting that "Notable" feeling. The articles read like filler. It's a good case for inclusion, but it just hasn't swayed me (yet). What has this company done to stand out from similar companies? A little newsfiller is nice, but I do not believe that the facts here indicate notability.--Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 06:32, 13 December 2012 (UTC)

I understand. Might it be acceptable to merely edit/delete the awards list rather than deleting the entire article?Beequeenth (talk) 13:36, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:25, 11 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Ri l ey    00:01, 12 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep - This topic passes Wikipedia's notability test and WP:CORPDEPTH per:
 * Dunshaughlin-based firm goes into liquidation
 * Employers think outside the McBox to attract help
 * How to get into hot water; Luxuries abound in today's hot tubs Tips for finding the right one for you
 * Liquid MAAX spas
 * Additional paywalled coverage:, ,
 * —There are also many articles listed in the references section of the article, some of which are from reliable sources, such as those from Edmonton Sun, Edmonton Journal, Appliance Magazine and others. Northamerica1000(talk) 07:41, 12 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep per Northamerica Mediran  talk to me! 08:45, 12 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep Notable, plenty of business news coverage. We need to vote based on facts not feelings. Mrfrobinson (talk) 15:32, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 00:39, 19 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep well referenced. Thankyoubaby (talk) 17:43, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.