Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Are Gifts from Employers Included in Taxable Income?


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. Carlossuarez46 05:49, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

Are Gifts from Employers Included in Taxable Income?

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Needs to be totally rewritten and renamed and/or merged, if it should even exist at all. Rocket000 21:57, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete I don't think Wikipedia does tax advice. MarkBul 22:20, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per Wikipedia not being a how-to guide. WP:NOT.  B figura  (talk) 22:40, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - It should not exist. Wikipedia is not legal advice. --Evb-wiki 22:45, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Wikipedia is not a how-to guide.  Additionally, nobody would type in a search criteria like that.  Useight 23:40, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge any useful information into Gift tax. I agree with everyone above that we don't need articles that ask a question for you in order to set up a how-to answer.  Mandsford 23:43, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Wikipedia does not give tax advice. Also, I believe that the user who created this article has also created an article entitled 26 USC 102(c), which covers the same topic in a more appropriate way. Also, I respectfully disagree with editor Mandsford regarding a merger into the Gift tax article. This is a Federal income tax topic, not a Federal gift tax topic. That is, the question is whether a certain kind of gift is includible in gross income (whether it's taxed) for Federal income tax purposes. Income tax and gift tax are two different things. Yours, Famspear 02:12, 23 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Comment: Actually, I believe I have misread what editor Mandsford wrote. Mandsford did not explicitly call for a merger into the Gift tax article, but rather merely suggested a merge of any "useful information." My apology to editor Mandsford. Famspear 02:15, 23 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete. Wikipedia is not Yahoo Answers. When the entire article's context can technically be "yes", then there's an issue. Smashville 04:38, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. As Evb-wiki - Wikepedia is not a source of legal advice - in addition article is completley US centric. Nigel Ish 12:02, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete and merge useful content and cites per Mandsford. Bearian 17:19, 23 September 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.