Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Are U 4 Real?


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   withdrawn by nominator. (non-admin closure) ~ mazca  t 19:24, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

Are U 4 Real?

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Not finding but a single review of this book. Fails WP:BK RadioFan (talk) 17:35, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep – The book is notable and I'm still expanding/adding sources to the article. You couldn't find any reviews because it hasn't been released in the US yet. There are several Swedish reviews, however, and it has won one of Sweden's most prestigious book awards. — The Le ft orium  17:48, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep, article has now been substantially expanded and sourced from the version that was AfD'ed, looks fine to me. I think it's worth waiting longer than 20 minutes from creation before AfDing a borderline article. ~ mazca  t 19:16, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. Well-known book, and it would be worth an article because of its adaptation into Sandor slash Ida (film). I see it just as a matter of convenience that it has been created under its designated English-language title rather than under its original title Sandor slash Ida. Also agree on the rest of the comment by Mazca, it is possible to PROD an article rather than to directly AFD it! Tomas e (talk) 10:43, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Withdrawn article has been significantly improved and some good sources have been ferreted out.--RadioFan (talk) 17:28, 8 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.