Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arebica


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy (IAR/SNOW) keep. There's a reliable (print) source cited right in the article itself, and more evidence that it's not a hoax has been brought forward here. Fut.Perf. ☼ 07:38, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

Arebica

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

I can't find any reliable sources at all, probably a hoax. europemayhem (talk) 03:37, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep. There are plenty of reliable sources, including for alternative names of the alphabet. There are more sources in other language wikipedia articles for this page, even in google books . I am starting to doubt the diligence of this nominator and doubt his userboxes claiming his association with Bosnia/Yugoslavia. Timurite (talk) 04:21, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bosnia-related deletion discussions.   -- RayAYang (talk) 05:39, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - the National and University Library of Bosnia and Herzegovina holds manuscripts written in Arebica, which I imagine would be quite difficult to achieve if the script were a hoax. Somno (talk) 05:48, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - Per above, subject passes WP:N. Tatarian (talk) 13:09, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep:I very much doubt this is a hoax in light of the above comments.  Balkan Fever  07:23, 1 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.