Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Areej Mohsin Darwish


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Femke (talk) 16:00, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

Areej Mohsin Darwish

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Non-notable entrepreneur. Fails WP:GNG. Amon Stutzman (talk) 09:57, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Women,  and Oman. Shellwood (talk) 12:26, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  13:16, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep. She is a notable business women in the Arab world and was the Arab business women of the year in 2022. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arab_Woman_of_the_Year_Award (SalahEldin1 (talk) 06:40, 7 July 2022 (UTC))
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Weak Delete - is not notable. Mathmo Talk 15:16, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

https://www.arabnews.com/node/2038016/business-economy (SalahEldin1 (talk) 05:27, 20 July 2022 (UTC)) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  14:12, 20 July 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  —&#8288;Scotty Wong &#8288;— 20:05, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
 * She was named 2nd most powerful businesswomen in the country of Oman in 2020. Named Arab business women of the year in 2021. https://www.albawaba.com/business/top-5-most-powerful-omani-businesswomen-2020
 * Keep Clearly notable based on sources and position in Arab world. And I'm concerned if source searching in the English language has been the basis for determining non-notability, if so, many, many notable non-English speaking people will be proposed for deletion. El Dubs (talk) 21:33, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * keep, seems to satisfy WP:GNG and overall achievemnts. Loew Galitz (talk) 20:49, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep - The article easily meets WP:GNG, and did even at the time of nomination before additional sources were added. WP:GNG is met, since there are more than enough reliable sources that provide significant coverage and are independent of the subject. It's not even a borderline case, this article's subject overwhelmingly meets the requirements of WP:GNG and WP:NBIO. - Aoidh (talk) 14:52, 5 August 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.