Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arekkusu


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Speedy Deleted per CSD A7. Nacon kantari 05:53, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

Arekkusu
To quote the first paragraph of the article, "Arekkusu is a fictional character that does not appear in the anime series Naruto. He is merely created by a fan to be a character that might live in that world. He will be a character in a upcoming fan-fiction that is not yet titled and the release date has not been set." Falls under No original research, Fancruft, and possibly other guidelines that I'm not familiar with. ~SnapperTo 21:02, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, I can't believe this person actually admits it to be a fanfic character. The others at least make it seem like their character is actually in the world. – Someguy0830 (Talk | contribs) 21:14, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Fanfic characters are never notable, but a fanfic character from an unreleased fanfic that hasn't even been given a title yet?!? That's like a black hole of non-notability right there.  Maybe if we set a notable article next to this one they'd cancel each other out and release vast amounts of energy, which could be used to power Wikipedia's servers for the next few millenia. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  22:20, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
 * One Thousand Years of Delete Danny Lilithborne 23:43, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletions.   -- Scee0 00:29, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above ... Fanfiction doesn't belong on wikipedia... (unless it's written by Vladamir Putin, Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono, Nicolas Sarkozy or someone equally famous... ) --Kunzite 01:04, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. One of the most eloquent nominations for deletion I've seen in a while. YechielMan 02:33, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete I previously nominated three different articles that were about Naruto fan characters. This is no different, it's got to go. Additionally, like Someguy, I'm suprised this author admitted it was a fan character; still doesn't make it any more encyclopedia-worthy, though. NeoChaosX [ talk | contribs ] 05:01, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletions.   -- NeoChaosX [ talk | contribs ]  05:05, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete This seems like an experiment in who can make an article that breaks most WP rules. Or an attempt for WP:BJAODN. Shinhan 06:01, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Fanfic character, which doesn't pass WP:FICTION, WP:NOT, WP:V, and WP:OR among other things. --TheFarix (Talk) 11:26, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete "... a character in a upcoming fan-fiction that is not yet titled ..." Why are we even discussing this fancruft?? --72.75.117.73 16:44, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
 * DeleteWP:OR - perhaps the creator should try Uncylopedia... Jpe|ob 00:37, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia Style: Permanent Delete Jutsu! (Delete per nom.) --Alexie 04:37, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
 * delete - NN, vanity and all that. Shiroi Hane 12:31, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.