Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arevan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:SOFTDELETE Mark Arsten (talk) 15:03, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

Arevan

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Game is non-notable and lacks sufficient coverage. Of the three sources present in the article, only one counts as significant coverage, and the other two are only trivial mentions/game data, in addition to being from the same source (BigFish Games). ArkRe (talk • contribs) 05:00, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 23:12, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 23:12, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

 CU note: Likely sock opinion struck. Amalthea 20:06, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete The Big-Fish games cites are just BF's own sales-rankings by the looks of things, so of no real use so far as establishing notability, other than that there's just an interview with a game vendor site. A search only brings up this RPGFan review as anything resembling a usable source. I'm not sure how well RPGFan is regarded when it comes to reliability, but without other sources to partner it with it's a moot point anyway. Someoneanother 18:43, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete as per Someoneanother. I think the RPGFan review could be reliable (I've seen that source used in other RPG Maker articles) but the problem is that there aren't any *other* reliable sources to go along with it. 124.180.9.143 (talk) 05:04, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Delete No reliable sources. The two BigFish Games references are just generic game data which is useless as far as sufficient coverage goes outside of simply verifying that it exists. The interview may be notable (as Aldorlea Games is the developer of the Laxius Force series) but I think more may be needed. There also may be a slight conflict of interest as the article appears to be written in a (to me) fairly promotional tone. RPGMakerMan (talk) 05:01, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Mr. Stradivarius  (have a chat) 09:56, 15 September 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.