Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arfan Akram


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Withdraw. (non-admin closure) Störm   (talk)  00:40, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

Arfan Akram

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Limited coverage, fails WP:GNG. Störm  (talk)  23:55, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:59, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:59, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:59, 15 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Weak delete 8 FC and 3 LA matches but all for uni or minor county sides, There's a lot of coverage of him working as a cricket co-ordinator, especially surrounding race with quotes from him in a number of articles, but I'm not sure any of it is significant coverage. No suitable redirect here as played for multiple different teams. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 09:22, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep Same reason as for his twin brother, scored a first-class century, reported in the Times https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/akram-has-class-to-deny-kent-97nrcjnwn38 Piecesofuk (talk) 17:40, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. Enough coverage to satisfy GNG. StickyWicket (talk) 16:35, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. Seems to have generated a reasonable amount of coverage as a cricket administrator. It's just a shame the best source of significant coverage falls foul of WP:DAILYMAIL . wjematherplease leave a message... 17:35, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Weak keep On review and having considered other votes, have changed my mind. Think there's just enough there for a GNG pass as some of those cricket administrator coverage is more than just routine coverage. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 19:50, 16 April 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.