Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arfenhouse (2 nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete; I refrained from salting it because the recreations aren't overly-close together, and that it may be possible, if someone gets lucky and finds it, to create a referenced, WEB-compliant article. This isn't malicious repeat in-quick-succession reposting, really. - Daniel.Bryant 09:46, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

Arfenhouse

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Web vanity that fails WP:WEB, and is recreated content that was deleted once before (see log). It also contains some original research, and is not written in the formal tone of an encyclopedia article. -- AAA!  ( AAAA ) 08:56, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Agree with AAA. Vanity. No proper sources other than an ad. Notability not established. Pewtercollector 17:19, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, possibly Speedy delete as re-creation of deleted material. Also WP:WEB, WP:V, WP:RS. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  18:06, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete and Salt as recreation of deleted material. Fails WP:WEB and WP:V. -- Kesh 01:32, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment, Arfenhouse has an article on Uncyclopedia. 58.178.57.252 02:54, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Which is really where that belongs. -- Kesh 03:36, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Yes, but looking at it, I think it will have a slim chance of survival... -- AAA!  ( AAAA ) 05:01, 26 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. SakotGrimshine 18:38, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete and protect per nom. CrazedNinja 01:51, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, but do not salt.This series of cartoons is as relevant as Salad Fingers, and yet that entry remains. Allow for a better recreation by someone who doesn't just want to advertise it.--Jimmydeanohyeah 12:48, 29 January 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.