Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Argentina–Cyprus relations


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 05:42, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

Argentina–Cyprus relations

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

another random combination noting that Cyprus has a non resident ambassador in a different continent. There are 2 bilateral agreements which don't seem to be covered at all in the media. otherwise coverage is only multilateral and sport. There's a naming of an Argentinian general to oversee Cyprus operations but I don't think this is the basis of notable relations (was his nationality relevant to the selection?). In 2006, Argentina's David Nalbandian played Cyprus' Marcos Baghdatis, which I know of at least 1 editor would think this helps establish notability and worthy of inclusion, clearly not. LibStar (talk) 05:13, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Why bother? I'm sure Docu will happily ignore any and all arguments that aren't on the side of "keep", so I don't see the point of devoting serious time to a rationale here. Badger Drink (talk) 06:35, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Adding this remark to several discussions about x-y relations is pointy. Docu has recused from closing these.— S Marshall   Talk / Cont  10:51, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
 * It is, in fact, "making a point" - on that, I am guilty as charged - but can you please indicate where I am "disrupting Wikipedia"? Thank you most handlessly in advance for your tiresome efforts towards resolving this pressing query of mine. Badger Drink (talk) 11:17, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
 * How witty! I can see that you're a complete and utter wit.  :)— S Marshall   Talk / Cont  14:20, 7 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Comment I see two-country relations articles been up for AfD all the time. It tells you a lot.-- The Legendary   Sky Attacker  06:50, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
 * well 90% of these nominated articles were created by a now banned editor. LibStar (talk) 01:47, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
 * and many of them get kept, and by many different admins. That tells us even more about the need to look at each one carefully. DGG (talk) 01:09, 8 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete. Yet another random pairing of countries for an article with no notability. Niteshift36 (talk) 06:52, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:N isn't met Nick-D (talk) 08:31, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Article has no useful content and expansion is unlikely. No sources discuss these relations. It exists, but it fails notability. Johnuniq (talk) 10:22, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cyprus-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 13:56, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Argentina-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 13:56, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
 *  Keep  Argintina and Cipris both are spelled with two "I"s. Drawn Some (talk) 21:44, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete There is a lack of significant coverage of this topic in independent reliable sources to achieve notability. Any article produced would be WP:SYNTHESIS at best. Drawn Some (talk) 21:44, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Put in single country article with the others. Collect (talk) 11:16, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete No significant coverage here - mere trivia. Eusebeus (talk) 18:28, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete for utter lack of independent, in-depth coverage of said relationship. - Biruitorul Talk 03:49, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable, contrived. The so-called rescue is randomly factoidic, of no informative quality, and with the transparent intent of making this topic look big and important with a level of detail that other articles never reach, and never should reach. Dahn (talk) 09:49, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment why is a rescue tag placed on this when there is no effort being made to save it? LibStar (talk) 05:07, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
 * See this comment for a possible explanation, scroll down to see the actual comment. Placing the rescue tag on an article calls the "squad" to "swarm" the AfD discussion. Drawn Some (talk) 12:46, 10 June 2009 (UTC)


 * I'm glad someone finally said it. Niteshift36 (talk) 23:22, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Notice: It has been suggested that AFDs and other discussions on this and similar articles be suspended. Please have your say on this at AN. Stifle (talk) 20:37, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.