Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Argentum Online


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:58, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

Argentum Online

 * – ( View AfD View log )

challenged prod. Unreferenced, orphan article. Not clear how this game meeting notability guidelines. A google search on the title brings up nothing in books or news and primary sources or download sites. RadioFan (talk) 00:59, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Since the article was created today, and how it's not inconceivable that a computer game like this could be notable, I'm inclined to allow the author some time to improve the article and justify notability. If he doesn't then I'd support a deletion Pi        (Talk to me!  ) 02:46, 19 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete due to lack of references for notability Pi        (Talk to me!  ) 09:04, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 02:47, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:47, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - No sources are given on the page and it is a poorly written artical. Skullbird11 (talk) 03:05, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - this is actually the 3rd time this topic has been PROD'd. So although it this version has only recently been written, I feel this AfD is a good opportunity to examine the game's notability. The custom VG Google search shows only one hit: a trivial mention at Gamasutra . I could find nothing compelling with a broader search - just directory and download sites. The author's objection to the PROD was 1) The game exists, and 2) The Spanish wikipedia has an article. I'm sorry, but this is not sufficient for inclusion here. Marasmusine (talk) 13:06, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.