Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Argh! (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was argh, delete! - Mailer Diablo 15:42, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

Argh!
This article was part of the mass AfD of "Esoteric Programming languages" overturned by DRV here. It is being relisted for individual consideration. All these languages will be relisted, at five/day to prevent congestion. This is a procedural nomination, so I abstain. Xoloz 14:45, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment There have been many previous esoteric programming language-related AfDs, often with mass nominations. Not all of the following will be relevant, but many may be.
 * Delete, no demonstrated notability.--Isotope23 20:00, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
 * --ais523 15:48, 18 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete Already merged, whilst certainly interesting, it's clearly a logical derivative of befunge only really adding data handling. Unlikely to be considered a prime base of future works, and hard to verify. LinaMishima 02:44, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep, already merged. Kappa 06:38, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect, already merged. --ais523 11:42, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - Wikipedia isn't a place for things invented in school in one day. If it's not used beyond being a programming joke, then it's a pretty useless article. - Hahnch  e  n 17:11, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per my rationale at Articles for deletion/Esoteric programming languages. —Ruud 19:56, 26 September 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.