Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Argo AI


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 17:01, 17 July 2020 (UTC)

Argo AI

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG. Poor refs. Note: Forbes.com is not a reliable source: see WP:FORBESCON. P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 17:47, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 17:47, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 17:47, 11 July 2020 (UTC)


 * Oppose/Keep I have edited the page. Added 30 secondary references including Reuters, NYTimes, Techcrunch, CBS, Wired, etc. Removed all primary sources. Fact checked information. I do not believe this article should be deleted as it meets GNG for a company and has more than enough press to support the information. Please let me know if there is anything else I need to do to get the page in shape or to respond to this nomination in an appropriate way. Thank you. Drsammyjohnson (talk) 20:46, 16 July 2020 (UTC)DrSammyJohnson


 * Objecting to AfD - After a cursory search for this company it is evident that there are plenty of refs to support WP:GNG. Amongst them are Techcrunch, TheVerge, CBS, AutoNews, CNet, etc. Most Self Driving Car companies have pages especially the current leaders in the field. I object to the deletion of this page - looking through Wikiguides to better understand how to properly Object to this AfD and I am going to draft a longer page so it is not a stub with relevant sources for. It may be better to move this page into a draft space to get it cleaned up before considering it for deletion Drsammyjohnson (talk) 16:22, 15 July 2020 (UTC)DrSammyJohnson


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.