Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Argus (Final Fantasy)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. RL0919 (talk) 15:15, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

Argus (Final Fantasy)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

The main page for all Final Fantasy monsters was deleted some time ago so a page for an individual monster from a single game should fall to the same reasoning but more so: not notable element of fiction. Axem Titanium (talk) 08:55, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MrKIA11 (talk) 14:40, 29 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete – I cannot find anything establishing notability here by a mile. Also seriously runs afoul of WP:GAMEGUIDE. –MuZemike 18:07, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per lack of notability. It also reads like one of those game databases, so I think it could be interpreted as indiscriminate information. --Taelus (talk) 21:37, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - No notability, and fails WP:GAMETRIVIA. Not deserving of a full article, but maybe worth a passing mention somehwere in Final Fantasy XI? Lord Spongefrog,  (I am Czar of all Russias!)  13:24, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete sounds a lot like a game-guide entry hence violating WP:GAMEGUIDE. Belongs in an article or a Final fantasy-pedia. matthewpaulster (talk) 03:27, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.