Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ari Lehman


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. J04n(talk page) 09:44, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

Ari Lehman

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

While I see how notability could be claimed, there are few to no reliable sources that substantiate actual significance. dci &#124;  TALK   19:06, 26 February 2013 (UTC)


 * The article is an English translation of the Swedish article about Ari Lehman. There is a German, a Spanish, a French, a Portuguese and a Swedish article about Ari Lehman, why not keep one in English also (especially since he is American)? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.226.147.67 (talk) 19:42, 26 February 2013 (UTC)


 * I would much like too keep this article. "There is no reason to have it" seems wrong. — Preceding unsigned comment added by John Larzoni (talk • contribs) 19:54, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
 * No one stated that there is no reason to have it; the problem is that the subject's notability does not appear to be substantiated through third-party coverage. Also, WP:Notability (people) gives a decent overview of what's necessary in these types of articles.   dci  &#124;  TALK   19:56, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:30, 27 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep - the fact that he played the first Jason is in dozens of print sources commenting on the moment when Jason emerges from the lake. How is that not notable? In ictu oculi (talk) 06:08, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
 * His role in the movie really doesn't seem the subject of significant coverage. Something of an example of this can be shown by Googling "Ari Lehman".   dci  &#124;  TALK   01:14, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 16:04, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Keep. At the very least, given Lehman's well documented iconic role, a redirect to the Jason article is the go. The is some (admitedely not the best) coverage in - and - . Another wekaer source  also mentions an upcoming article in "men's magazine" Blender. A stub or a redirect is appropriate here. duffbeerforme (talk) 11:41, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Keeper  |  76  15:19, 14 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Jason Voorhees. All his notability seems based on this one role, and those interested in him are most likely curious about that role. Ducknish (talk) 22:51, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
 * I'm inclined to doubt that anyone will look him up; also, I don't really know if redirecting an actor's name to that of a character is necessarily the best way to go about things. However, I have no real objection to a redirect if that is what consensus decides upon.   dci  &#124;  TALK   21:16, 16 March 2013 (UTC)


 * As stated earlier, the article is an English translation of the Swedish article about Ari Lehman. There is a German, a Spanish, a French, a Portuguese and a Swedish article about Ari Lehman, why not keep one in English also (especially since he is American)?
 * Keep – SJ + 02:06, 21 March 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.