Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aria Pullman


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MelanieN (talk) 01:53, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

Aria Pullman

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Lack of third party reliable sources. Unsure if it passes WP:GNG. BriefEdits (talk) 15:33, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. BriefEdits (talk) 15:33, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. BriefEdits (talk) 15:33, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. BriefEdits (talk) 15:33, 7 April 2022 (UTC)

Delete - From an analysis of this article's 29 total sources, virtually all of them are either unreliable (blogs, press releases), unsuitable (Spotify, SoundCloud), or directly connected to her. A further search didn't turn up much of use either. Delete per WP:BIO. -🌀 Locomotive207 - talk  🌀  16:07, 7 April 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   21:15, 15 April 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  23:49, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment Some of her music career is described in the context of this 2017 Paste article focused on her husband's music career. She is also noted as a director of a music video for his band by Broadway World in 2022. In 2018, Atwood Magazine refers to her as Aria Pullman Ostrander and AO in an article focused on her, a debut single and a music video. Beccaynr (talk) 16:09, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
 *  Weak keep  The Atwood magazine plus the It's all inside piece are two reviews of her work, possibly meeting WP:ARTIST that said, are they independent? The both quote her. She's also mentioned in The Deli Magazine (not exactly the New York Times) and very briefly in elsewhere for her directing of a music video, more of a passing mention than a review. So my ability to defend my keep argument is flimsy, I see that. But I'll go with !keep for the combination of all of the above. CT55555 (talk) 18:04, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
 * I would argue that the quality and quantity of sources in regards to her discography is not enough to establish a "significant or well-known work or collective body of work. In addition, such work must have been the primary subject of an independent and notable work." in ARTIST. Most other mentions are passing in nature. — BriefEdits (talk) 20:17, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
 * That is a fair critique and I think agreement with most of my justification, except I think my final conclusion. CT55555 (talk) 20:32, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
 * I find the arguments from the delete crowd to be persuasive. I'm changing my !vote to abstain. CT55555 (talk) 18:43, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep: There might be a case for seeking more detailed sources but those given appear adequate for at least establishing general notability.--Ipigott (talk) 09:31, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
 * I've edited the original links in question. Keep. Aoaomusic (talk) 19:19, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete There appears to be insufficient support for notability based on independent and reliable sources for this vanispamcruftisement. Since the AfD began, I searched for sources and after reviewing the editing history that preceded the AfD, tried to clean up promotional content. Beccaynr (talk) 18:32, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete notability is not demonstrated. User:力 (powera, π,  ν ) 17:09, 23 April 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.