Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ariadaha Kalachand High School (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ to Ariadaha. Liz Read! Talk! 21:43, 26 December 2023 (UTC)

Ariadaha Kalachand High School
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

There is nothing to show that this school is notable. Fails WP:NSCHOOL. The referencing shows nothing. Schools are no longer inherently notable. There must be something of particular verifiable notability for this to remain here. 🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 23:20, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and India. 🇺🇦  Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 23:20, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of West Bengal-related deletion discussions.  Delta  space 42  (talk • contribs) 23:44, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
 * At minimum redirect to Ariadaha, the area in which the school is located as an AtD if sources deemed insufficient to support notability for a separate article; the school's already listed there. Possible merge of some of the school's history. As the first AfD showed there are news sources about the cutting of pupils' hair as a disciplinary measure in 2022. Coverage is Kolkata-wide and may amount to state-wide but it's questionable whether this meets what's suggested by prominent scandal of WP:NGO. In any case the event by itself is not sufficient to meet notability for the school under NORG or GNG. The sources in the article are school listing websites and the school's own website, which have no bearing on notability, although taking into account the age of the school there may be offline sources reporting for example, its centenary. Rupples (talk) 08:40, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Very weak redirect: This is definitely an edge case, while the sources in the previous AfD are certainly something, I'm not sure that one incident is enough to pass NCORP or GNG. Redirect instead of delete per Rupples. Queen   of   Hearts ❤️  (she/they 🎄 🏳️‍⚧️) 03:02, 21 December 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.