Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ariana Strozzi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 01:44, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

Ariana Strozzi

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Nice resume, but no real evidence of notability. Biruitorul Talk 02:44, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
 * weak keep - mentioned in sources such as this. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ( talk  ) 03:34, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
 * keep for the same reason. At the pace you just nominated 2 dozen articles, did you even read through them all properly?JJJ999 (talk) 03:45, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Can you say puff piece? -- Biruitorul Talk 03:52, 4 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:05, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Notability easy to verify. Being poorly written or "puffy" is no reason for deletion... only for improvement.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 16:23, 5 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete. What are clearly local interest pieces in a regional newspaper (even one that is a paper of record on certain issues) does not constitute "significant coverage" (IMO). Bongomatic (talk) 03:47, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  20:44, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:09, 9 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep, it's a candidate for cleanup, not deletion. RockManQ  (talk) 01:18, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment - Any reason this didn't go up for WP:PROD first? &mdash;  X   S   G   02:58, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - Despite all claims above, while searching the net for references I found nothing that could substantiate notability. Self-published books, people talking about a class she taught, but... nothing about the subject. &mdash;   X   S   G   04:56, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Lot's of self-generated publicity on the web, which is the place for it--not wikipedia. One self-published book. That sfgate took the hook doesn't mean that we have to. DGG (talk) 18:44, 9 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.