Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aricent


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. Discuss eventual merge in the respective talk pages. --Ezeu 19:40, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

Aricent
This article fails WP:CORP. The 88 unique search results do nothing to bolster notability, nor does anything cited in the article. Erechtheus 21:05, 27 October 2006 (UTC) style="color:blue;font-variant:small-caps">b o b b y ]] 21:15, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - per ^^. [[User:Robertbcole|- <em
 * Delete - per nom. Coasttocoast 22:31, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:CORP and WP:V. Prolog 00:24, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep. It is a newborn brand and now google shows noticable hits. But not sure if that's enough to meet WP:CORP - sooraj 11:12, 29 October 2006 (UTC)    Smerge then Redirect  - Per Erechtheus. Should be merged with Flextronics Software Systems and then, may be moved to "Aricent". - sooraj 16:58, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. It's a new name of an established company. Google gives a reasonable amount of hits for Aricent.bpangti 4:47, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment 155 unique results is a reasonable number? As far as I can tell, this is a spin-off. Why should it have its own article before it has done something notable? Erechtheus 03:18, 31 October 2006 (UTC):


 * Keep. It is a rename for an established company which has made significant contributions to communications R&D, and has played an important role in Indian outsourcing. tstrudley 13:00, 31 October 2006 (PST)
 * Comment If this is indeed an established company and not a spinoff, why is there any need for a new article on the subject matter? Shouldn't the old article simply be updated and moved with a redirect left behind? Erechtheus 04:40, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment I believe that you have identified the correct solution: the old article (FSS) has been updated and copied to the new article (Aricent) - all that remains is to put a redirect in place. tstrudley 12:31, 1 November 2006 (PST)
 * Keep. It is a new name for a company which has made history in India. This is the only location on the web with the evolution of the single largest equity buy-out in Indian history to date. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SatsJ (talk • contribs)
 * CommentAre you suggesting that there is an original research problem with this article? I don't recall any offline sources cited. I'll have to look deeper. Erechtheus 06:11, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment.No, the problem is not with the offline sources . I meant that this article provides information on web , about a company,( which has been renamed )which attracted the largest PE buy out due to the it's role in communications software , Indian outsourcing and HR practices . The buying firm KKR is known for it's large buy outs and has a successful history of last 3 decades.
 * Keep. A company worth $900,000,000 is certainly a lot more notable than every single song on every album of some moderately notable rock group and most everything else on Wikipedia.  Gene Nygaard 14:23, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Flextronics is no longer associated with Aricent though it retains a 15% stake. It might provide misleading information to the user
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.