Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ariel Day


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Decline WP:CSD, that doesn't apply to made-up "days", but on this particular "day" it's SNOWing. JohnCD (talk) 21:52, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

Ariel Day

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Non-notable holiday. Delete.  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 04:12, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete I hate to say this. (It's a bad reason) but per nom. Fails WP:GNG NativeForeigner Talk/Contribs 04:55, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm tempted to WP:IAR and tag this for speedy as an attempt to circumvent the wording of speedy criterion A7 (people). --  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 05:04, 21 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Speedy Delete - Wikipedia is not for something made up one day. EeepEeep (talk) 05:09, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete It might not be made up, but a holiday invented by the staff of a non-notable newspaper is not notable. Bradjamesbrown (talk) 05:46, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, non-notable and WP:MADEUP. IAR to speedy delete may be appropriate as well, but at this point WP:SNOW works just as well.   Glenfarclas   ( talk ) 05:57, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per everybody. If someone created this article in hopes of convincing people to give them gifts on this holiday, they made a mistake in scheduling the holiday in October. This article will be lucky to last until January 28, much less October. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 07:39, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Strong delete per WP:GNG, WP:V, WP:HOAX, WP:NOTWEBHOST, WP:IINFO, WP:SNOW, etc, etc. See below. Ivanvector (talk) 09:11, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete even if it takes the mighty WP:IAR to make it happen. Pitiful vanity article. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  23:22, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Strong delete, per all of the above and not even a straight-faced attempt to assert notability. There should be a speedy category for things like this. TJRC (talk) 21:41, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per CSD A7. I thought the tag was declined by an administrator, but when I went looking for the explanation, I realized it was the page creator that removed the tag, without due process.  Hence my change of !vote. Ivanvector (talk) 00:47, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete: Per WP:MADEUP. Joe Chill (talk) 01:11, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.