Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ariel Hyatt (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 04:31, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Ariel Hyatt
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Tagged for notability since March. Despite having 19 citations, I have not found any that are acceptable/verify notability. All the ones I have checked were brief mentions, blogs, and other low-quality sources used to make a vanity page appear well-sourced, whereas it isn't actually upon deeper investigation. CorporateM (Talk) 05:28, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:34, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:34, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:34, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:34, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:34, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Michig (talk) 08:48, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. Refbombed promo piece. Hyatt lacks depth of coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. Only the local interest piece from BerkshiresWeek identified last afd is of any use.By itself it's not enough. duffbeerforme (talk) 04:25, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.