Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arielle (singer) (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  So Why  17:27, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

Arielle (singer)
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non notable musician. CMT are badcharts anf not sourced. She lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. A look at current sourcing: 1. Her talking about herself. 2. Buzznet, a social media network. 4. Interveiwee pays for the interview. Her talking about herself. 5. Her talking about herself. 6. Dead, Her talking about herself, guitar shop, not a reliable source. 7. Her talking about herself. 8. Blog post, no depth of coverage. 9. Blog post on activist website. 10. Concert announcement. 11. Wordpress blog, Her talking about herself. 12. Her talking about herself. 13. dead dead, appears to be just a video clip. 14. Just a video clip, dead. 15. Just a video clip. 16. Search Engine Optimization business. Dead dead interview. 17. Her talking about herself. That leaves 3. One reasonable article. A search found nothing better. duffbeerforme (talk) 03:04, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  04:41, 22 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Comment Her Youtube view counts suggest non-notability. Power~enwiki (talk) 06:04, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   12:13, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   12:13, 22 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete There is a lot of stuff here, but none of the sources provided are indicative of the in-depth coverage that establishes notability. Nor could any additional sources be found in a Google search. Alansohn (talk) 14:23, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:46, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  So Why  07:03, 2 June 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 07:14, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - searches did not turn up the type of in-depth coverage to show she passes WP:GNG.  Onel 5969  TT me 14:43, 18 June 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.