Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arielle Stevenson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. The Bushranger One ping only 11:54, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

Arielle Stevenson

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No clear indication of notability, no independent references. Unwisely accepted from AfC two years ago.  DGG ( talk ) 03:03, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. I see where she's written things, but not where she's actually been the focus of any in-depth coverage. I also can't see where any of her articles/shows/photos are so notable that they'd merit a keep on that basis either. She exists, I'm familiar with her work, and I believe I've used her as a RS before, but that doesn't give notability on any of those fronts. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   03:41, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:07, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:07, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:08, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:08, 7 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete Being a journalist, even NYT published, isn't notable. Need sources about the journalist or work. Typically with book reviews when/if publish a book. Or a major award such as Pulitzer. -- Green Cardamom (talk) 03:53, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:AUTHOR. Run-of-the-mill journalist who may have received a bit of coverage in local press due to her age, but otherwise has done nothing and written nothing to achieve notability. Doesn't meet WP:GNG based on online sources. --Colapeninsula (talk) 13:40, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.