Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arif Nezami


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Uncontested. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:18, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

Arif Nezami

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not pass GNG. Ibrahim Husain Meraj (talk) 13:16, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. Ibrahim Husain Meraj (talk) 13:45, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Ibrahim Husain Meraj (talk) 13:45, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. &mdash;  Rhododendrites  talk  \\ 20:39, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Ibrahim Husain Meraj (talk) 13:45, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. &mdash;  Rhododendrites  talk  \\ 20:39, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete as none of this even satisfies the general notability, none of the current coverage is convincing enough. SwisterTwister   talk  06:39, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:03, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete The Dhaka Tribune is usually a reliable source, but in this case they've republished a list put out by SD ASIA, a company that creates "marketing access for entrepreneurs" and specializes in "PR & branding". Being on their "Inspiring individuals to follow in 2015 in Bangladesh" list is meaningless notability-wise. Searches of the usual Google types, HighBeam, and EBSCO found no significant coverage in independent reliable sources, so fails WP:BASIC. Worldbruce (talk) 06:12, 9 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.