Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arik Ascherman


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talk about my edits? 10:17, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

Arik Ascherman

 * – ( View AfD View log )

not notable, no sources or RS in googleland at all Soosim (talk) 11:39, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep. Meets WP:GNG, plenty of WP:RS, and any number of WP:Three Letter Abbreviations. Despite some misgivings, I do assume good faith for this deletion nomination. --Shirt58 (talk) 14:10, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 22:45, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 22:45, 15 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep. I added plenty of reliable sources to the page. He obviously is notable. Yoninah (talk) 23:24, 16 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Speedy keep Satisfies WP:BIO in spades. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 17:54, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep There may be no sources in googleland, but the ones now in the article satisfy the notability standard. Alansohn (talk) 20:02, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.