Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arion Investment Management Limited


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:40, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Arion Investment Management Limited

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

fails WP:CORP and WP:GNG John from Idegon (talk) 05:01, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Mark the trainDiscuss 05:48, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Management-related deletion discussions. Mark the trainDiscuss 05:48, 2 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete it's an advert for a startup. Cabayi (talk) 06:58, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete clearly WP:PROMOTIONAL, fails GNG &#32;DocumentError (talk) 07:59, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete: there are two issues here: promotionalism and sourcing to show corporate notability. I can't find any significant coverage from a source search.  Let's analyse the sources it cites:
 * Is a Bloomberg entry which confers no notability whatsoever other than that it exists.
 * Is a source preceding the startup's opening and assumes inherited notability from the personnel background i.e. Morgan Stanley. But notability isn't inherited.
 * Is another source just about the launch.
 * Is yet another source just about the collapse of the preceding company.
 * Confers no notability at all as it's just a subscription page.
 * Is another source about the launch.
 * So the only sources which are both reliable and give significant coverage are #4 and #6 but it's a case of a crystal ball article. At the moment, we can't establish notability - maybe once they've been trading for a while they will become notable but at the moment it's a delete from me.
 *  Dr Strauss   talk   09:49, 2 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete as per above. Fails GNG and WP:NCORP and is promotional. -- HighKing ++ 15:39, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:58, 2 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete. Fails notability. -★- PlyrStar93 . → Message me. ← 21:13, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete A spammy article about a company that has not received significant coverage in reliable sources. AusLondonder (talk) 00:42, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - Oooky corporate spam about a company that fails GNG, in my opinion. Carrite (talk) 11:47, 9 October 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.