Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aris Sterodimas


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 15:09, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

Aris Sterodimas

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

Bio stub for a plastic surgeon. No indication of notability except that he has published a number of book chapters and peer-reviewed publications. The Web of Science lists 31 publications that have been cited a total of 41 times. Most cited ones have counts of 8-8-6-5, with an h-index of 4. I do not find any citations in WoS to the book chapters. Does not meet WP:PROF. Crusio (talk) 15:12, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

You need to perform a correct search. There are 35 articles cited by Pubmed.If you do not know how to search, please learn your job, otherwise please quit your job.Secondly there are 5 book chapters written by Dr Sterodimas and your job is to cite them iotherwise again quit your job. There are more than 15 lectures given on tissue engineering in the last 3 months and he is considered as a leader in Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine worldwide. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.219.108.194 (talk) 15:25, 25 October 2010 (UTC) — 194.219.108.194 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Greece-related deletion discussions.  -- Crusio (talk) 15:12, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions.  -- Crusio (talk) 15:12, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  -- Crusio (talk) 15:13, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Crusio's citation findings are correct. Article is recitation of training with no real claim of notability aside from publication count. Aggressive tone of previous SPA entry completely uncalled for – I would respectfully submit that the slim notice of his work, according to citation count, contradicts the claim that "he is considered as a leader in Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine worldwide". Are there any reliable sources that back this claim up? If not, I would say this article is unlikely to survive AfD. Respectfully, Agricola44 (talk) 15:38, 25 October 2010 (UTC).
 * Delete. No assertion of notability. Fails WP:PROF. Location (talk) 17:13, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
 *  Do not DeleteLeader in Plastic Surgery and applications of ADSCs in Regenerative Medicine.Do your homework guys. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.4.120.225 (talk) 17:19, 25 October 2010 (UTC)  — 188.4.120.225 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Comment to the anonymous IPs: instead of jelling, a much more effective strategy here is to provide evidence of Dr. Sterodimas' notability. I'd be the first to withdraw the nom if sufficient evidence comes up. --Crusio (talk) 17:27, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

http://books.google.com/books?id=K-HYbvHxcKcC&pg=PA328&lpg=PA328&dq=sterodimas&source=bl&ots=8kwY1L92y-&sig=tgWbMirFNHhBAXbfTYsqwu5q_SY&hl=en&ei=iL_FTICAHcHFswa4wrzSCA&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=7&ved=0CCQQ6AEwBjge#v=onepage&q=sterodimas&f=false —Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.4.120.225 (talk) 17:37, 25 October 2010 (UTC) — 188.4.120.225 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Comment to Crusio When you make claims against a manuscript, you have to provide evidence by searching correctly.I just advised you to do your homework my friend.
 * Comment to Crusio Let me help you. Click on the link below as you are not capable of doing your homework.Lets see after that If you learn....
 * Comment I think you misinterpret the comments in the nom. Web of Science lists 31 articles (their coverage differs from PubMed) and it is really not important whether there are 31 or 35 articles. What is important is that they have hardly been cited by other researchers, that is, they have made no impact. The comment in the nom about the chapters does not mean that I doubt they exist (as your Google link shows for one of them), but, again, that nobody has cited these chapters. Now before accusing others here of not being capable of doing their homework, I suggest you try to understand what is being said here. Start with reading WP:PROF. --Crusio (talk) 18:20, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment These book chapters have been recently published ( check on the date of publication). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.4.120.225 (talk) 18:30, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes, and? At best, this may mean that he may become notable somewhere in the future. But Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. --Crusio (talk) 19:19, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

 Do not Delete 35 publications on pioneer in adipose tissue engineering —Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.4.120.225 (talk) 18:34, 26 October 2010 (UTC)  — 188.4.120.225 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Delete per Crusio. Ray  Talk 20:13, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
 *  Delete  per Crusio. Xxanthippe (talk) 21:31, 25 October 2010 (UTC).
 * Delete. GS gives h index of 4. Not nearly enough. Xxanthippe (talk) 04:46, 26 October 2010 (UTC).
 *  Do not Delete Pioneer in Regenerative Medicine.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.219.108.194 (talk) 09:03, 26 October 2010 (UTC)  — 194.219.108.194 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.