Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aristides M. Tsatsakis


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Eddie891 Talk Work 13:14, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

Aristides_M._Tsatsakis
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log )

This reads like a resume. It lists accomplishments with no citations, and it was created by a single user who is no longer active. This smacks of self-promotion DigitalPants (talk) 03:14, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

Agree, it seems it lacks notability. Cinadon36 04:36, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2021 April 8.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 03:48, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep, while I share the concerns of the nominator on the promotional tone, Tsatsakis easily passes NACADEMIC. He doesn't have a google scholar profile, but his h-index is well over 20 which possibly satisfies criterion #1. Looking at his cv, he is academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences and member of The World Academy of Sciences, which would satisfy criterion #3. He is also ex-president / honorary president of several societies, which may satisfy criterion #6. He is RIFM Managing Editor (which isn't chief editor, unsure of scope) at Food and Chemical Toxicology and chief editor of Toxicology Reports, I am not sure this satisfies criterion #8, but it may. To summarize while the article could use cleanup, Tsatsakis passes academic notability.-- Eostrix  (&#x1F989; hoot hoot&#x1F989;) 06:44, 8 April 2021 (UTC)


 * All of these are borderline though. H index doesnt translate to "significant impact in their scholarly discipline". I would like to see a published article making that claim. Same goes for cr #3. Cinadon36 08:19, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Citations are the normal way to judge impact in a scholarly discipline (Semantic Scholar has him with an h-index of 29 (in an un-managed profile, which may be incomplete), Google Scholar has him at 72, his publications in Greek and Russian complicate searching for his name - google scholar gives better results with the Greek name (Αριστείδης Τσατσάκης) for an odd reason even though the publications are mostly English). Being a member of the Russian Academy of Sciences and the The World Academy of Sciences is a very clear pass of WP:NACADEMIC#3, and is not borderline at all.-- Eostrix  (&#x1F989; hoot hoot&#x1F989;) 08:33, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:28, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Greece-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:28, 8 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Speedy keep, per Eostrix. Nothing "borderline" here, clearly passes WP:PROF on multiple grounds, including having h-index of 72, and multiple significant honors and awards (WP:PROF). Being a full member of the the Russian Academy of Sciences also clearly qualifies under WP:PROF. The article does need some cleanup but WP:DINC. Nsk92 (talk) 10:51, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep, per GS he has an h index of 72 and 22509 citations. Clearly passes WP:NPROF#1. --hroest 13:49, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep. Scopus gives him 15058 citations and an h-index of 58. JoelleJay (talk) 15:58, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep clearly passes WP:NPROF. Bebopjohnson (talk) 17:07, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep based on awards and honors, meets WP:PROF. Webmaster862 (talk) 01:57, 9 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep convinced by the arguments of and others.Cinadon36</b> 06:40, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. The citation record looks strong but membership in RAS seems a more clear-cut way of determining this to me. —David Eppstein (talk) 06:43, 15 April 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.