Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aristotle, Inc.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Consensus against deletion. Merge can be discussed further on article talk page. czar ⨹   04:07, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

Aristotle, Inc.

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Very difficult to do searches for, since the company is named after ancient greek philosopher Aristotle, who is also sometimes cited as an ancient contributor to the origins of public relations. The Hoovers profile that is the only source cited certainly does not impart notability. 100 staff does not suggest notability from a size perspective. There is no particular claim to notability. CorporateM (Talk) 22:28, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment. There is better content about this company in the biographical article for John Aristotle Phillips, who is probably still better known as the guy who designed a nuclear weapon for his 1976 junior paper at Princeton.  In particular, there's a link there to a  long 2007 Vanity Fair article about the company.   The Vanity Fair profile provoked a substantial comment in Wired   Other coverage includes a 2000 New York Times article  and a 2012 piece in the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel. So, the company is likely notable.  It could be discussed whether a separate article is needed or whether it's enough to merge/redirect to John Aristotle Phillips. --Arxiloxos (talk) 00:07, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep or at worst merge with redirect. Looks like enough may be available to be WP:GNG. VMS Mosaic (talk) 06:39, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington, D.C.-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:32, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:32, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:32, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 11:41, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep The links that shared are enough to convince me that the company is notable. Whether it should be merged ... I'm not sure, perhaps that is a question better suited for the articles' talk pages. – Philosopher Let us reason together. 00:08, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.