Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arivaal Chuttika Nakshatram


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. If User Anish Viswa wishes, I can userfy the article to the user's respective page. Kindly direct all userfication requests to my talk page. Thanks.  Wifione  Message 09:56, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

Arivaal Chuttika Nakshatram

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Film not yet released; this is a bit crystal bally! Pesky ( talk  …stalk!) 08:30, 12 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep: First of all, release is not a criterion for a film to have an article in Wikipedia. Upcoming films can have articles, if they are confirmed projects already in various stages of production or post-production. Even a film like Hobbits slated for 2012 December release, has a article in Wikipedia. Additionally, we added 6 reference links to website reports about this film, to prove its validity and verifiability. A simple search on this article in Google gives a lot of pages of results, indicating the notability of this article. The film is currently under production and will be completed in 2-3 months, during the period, we can add more details, production details, film poster etc. So, we don't think this article in any way, falls under 'Crystal Ball'. Anish Viswa   08:47, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete While future films might have an article, per WP:NFF, "Films that have not been confirmed by reliable sources to have commenced principal photography should not have their own articles."  According to the only source that mentions filming dates, the filming will not commence until November.  Also, all the sources are just the same rehash of the PR announcement.  No reference goes into any detail about the film. Bgwhite (talk) 09:28, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NFF. Pam  D  09:48, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  —Tom Morris (talk) 18:30, 12 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Userfy. Return for a short while to author User:Anishviswa.  This planned film IS getting coverage and IS pushing at being one of those allowable exceptions to NFF per article's ELs (which would have been better used as citations): Considering the persons involved, it is far likely that we will hear more and not less.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 18:52, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 23:03, 12 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:NFF. Suggest a user-fy. Regards, RJH (talk) 17:38, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.