Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arjun – Prince of Bali


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ to Green Gold Animations. If editors think anothe target article is better, feel free to start a discussion on the redirect talk page. Liz Read! Talk! 03:25, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

Arjun – Prince of Bali

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:GNG. M S Hassan (talk) 12:55, 13 June 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 17:05, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete, fails all notability guidelines. While the before search turned up nothing useful, the existing four sources in the article are not reliable. The first source in the article which does not appear reliable is just two short paragraphs and it is about a game developed to popularise the the series. The other three sources are from a single publisher with lengthy quotes from the producers themselves without an independent review. Piscili (talk) 13:10, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television, Comics and animation,  and India. Owen&times;  &#9742;  13:48, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep: Redirect to Chhota Bheem and the Throne of Bali for example if sources on the page are not judged sufficient, and for example, also see https://www.afaqs.com/news/media/44417_game-for-disneys-new-show-arjun-the-prince-of-bali ; (https://mumbaimirror.indiatimes.com/entertainment/tv/chhota-bheem-gets-musical/articleshow/63977507.cms (brief mention)); 3 years on Disney Channel... Opposed to deletion - My, oh my!  (Mushy Yank)  16:10, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Green_Gold_Animations. Per nom. RangersRus (talk) 12:35, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Relisting comment: Not sure why editors are voting to "redirect per nom" if the nom doesn't appear to be proposing a redirect? Relisting for further input. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 04:33, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Green Gold Animations: per nom, no WP:SIGCOV  C F A   💬  16:10, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete: I believe the subject is not significant enough and doesn't meet the notability guidelines. EncyclopediaEditorXIV (talk) 14:22, 28 June 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.