Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ark Clothing


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 01:22, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

Ark Clothing

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable. Philafrenzy (talk) 10:47, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 11:17, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 11:17, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 11:17, 5 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment - Some sources below. Northamerica1000(talk) 11:07, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
 * JD Sports buys retailer Ark out of administration - Telegraph
 * Ark Clothing Launch New Website


 * Comment could merge to JD Sports if it's not notable, since JD Sports has bought it. --Colapeninsula (talk) 11:46, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep Notable international chain of clothing retail stores. Merge might also be worth considering. Is it being integrated or is it being kept separate? Candleabracadabra (talk) 14:42, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 10:04, 13 February 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Keep and possibly merge. At the least, a merge would be more functional than outright deletion of this article. Northamerica1000(talk) 18:57, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Northamerica1000(talk) 07:00, 22 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep Established firm, Has coverage in major national news Leondz (talk) 12:35, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.