Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ark Linux (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 17:32, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

Ark Linux
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Notability tag has been there since 2009, searching online yielded no reliable third-party sources to establish the notability of Ark Linux; subject fails WP:GNG. SudoGhost 12:10, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - It is a real distribution, but there seems to be nothing particularly noteworthy about it. --Kristjan Wager (talk) 12:25, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete subject is clearly non-notable. Ducknish (talk) 15:11, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 18:45, 29 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete as per the above. Is there some "List of Linux Distributions" that would serve as a redirect target? Since this is a real distribution, it might be a reasonable search term, so a Redirect makes sense here as well. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 15:24, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
 * The consensus at Talk:List of Linux distributions seems to follow the standard at several other "List of ..." software articles, where entries meet the first criteria of WP:LSC (each entry meeting the notability criteria). If there's no article and no reliable sources for Ark Linux, it very likely doesn't meet that criteria. - SudoGhost 19:50, 2 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep because there are a couple notable features, as evidenced by the reviews. There aren't any other distros (that I know of) that can be installed in as little as four clicks, nor any that offer a Tetris clone while the packages are installing. They also provide their custom "Mission Control" control center. A few (not all) of the reviews are linked to on the DistroWatch page (http://distrowatch.com/table.php?distribution=ark), while others may be found via Google. ~Piki (talk) 20:11, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.