Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arkus (IRML S.A.)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 07:20, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

Arkus (IRML S.A.)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I earlier deleted this as an entirely promotional article. It has since been re-created and I think remains highly promotional, with no outside reliable sources--everything is a press release or closely based on one. I'd rather not use G11 again, but ask for a community decision.  DGG ( talk ) 22:26, 23 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Comment. We have reviewed the article according to different contributors suggestions. Please provide us with feedback on how to make it better and help us so that we can keep it on Wikipedia.  Chatzjohn —Preceding undated comment added 07:08, 24 April 2013‎ (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  czar   &middot;   &middot;  00:01, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  czar   &middot;   &middot;  00:01, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Luxembourg-related deletion discussions.  czar   &middot;   &middot;  00:01, 24 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Theopolisme ( talk )  01:10, 30 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Comment. Who is "we" who have reviewed the article? (And where did this feedback come? The article has no talk page and the only comment at User_talk:Chatzjohn is the AfD notice.) The use of "we", along with the single-issue editing of  suggests that the page was probably created by somebody very closely involved with the subject (WP:COI). Dricherby (talk) 10:36, 30 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar   &middot;   &middot;  02:20, 7 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete Promotional, I couldn't find any notability and I'm concerned by the conflict of interest I mentioned above. Dricherby (talk) 10:12, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Appears to be company account with paid editors. See WP:ROLE. Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 03:59, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.