Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arlo Jackson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. JohnCD (talk) 21:59, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Arlo Jackson

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Not a notable musician, no reliable sources found to indicate that he is notable. Mattg82 (talk) 20:26, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. I'm not finding significant coverage in reliable sources for this person; does not appear to meet WP:GNG or WP:MUSIC at this time.  Gongshow  Talk 21:52, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

FURTHERMORE IT WAS FOOLISH OF YOU TO TAKE THIS ACTION. THANK YOU — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.24.118.146 (talk) 03:31, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
 * ARLO JACKSON- IS A VERY REPUTABLE MUSICIAN.. IN FACT IF YOU GOOGLE HIM MOR HIS PRODUCTION COMPANY YOU WILL SEE HE IS CURRENTLY CREATING MUSICAL COMPOSITIONS AND ALSO ACTIVE IN THE SKATEBOARDING COMMUNITY....
 * Comment - You'd a lot more persuasive if you backed up your claims with proof, with reliable, third party sources about why he's notable, rather than writing in ALL CAPS and calling people foolish... Sergecross73   msg me   15:12, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 16:51, 8 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete - Partly per nom. Partly because it appears to be an autobiography as well (not a reason in and of itself, but rarely a good sign), and lacks any independent sources.  While we're at it, we might want to put up one of those "this is not a vote" templates in the event that we get some more "interesting" comments like the above.Tyrenon (talk) 21:07, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Notability is not demonstrated in any way that relates to WP WP:N policy.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 01:29, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - Lack of third party coverage. Doesn't meet WP:GNG. Sergecross73   msg me   15:12, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete per the fact that he doesn't meet WP:GNG. No evidence of notability. -- andy4789 ★ ·  (talk?   contribs?)  22:51, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.