Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arm Wrestling (arcade game)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep. Mailer Diablo 00:34, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

Arm Wrestling (arcade game)
I think this page should be deleted because there is only one sentence on the page and I don't think alot can be added to it. Gamerforever 00:55, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Give it time. Travislangley 06:33, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep It's a real game1, and the sentence is factual. It has the potential to be more than a stub, if someone who's actually played the game comes around and adds something. --djrobgordon 02:54, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Arm Wrestling? There's really not much to say there. Non-notable. Jaxal1 03:22, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, really bad start... but, I think with the link it serves some purpose. gren グレン 03:27, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep I am going to save this article now. rydia 03:36, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep and expand. --Ter e nce Ong 03:54, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment - I moved to Arm Wrestling since it was unused... arm wrestling, of course, is that little game thing. gren グレン 05:26, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Shouldnt it have stayed at the original title?, having articles with only a capital letter thats different is confusing -- Astrokey44 |talk 10:54, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
 * If you want. But make you you redirect Arm Wrestling to Arm wrestling and put a disambiguation on the top if it that link to Arm Wrestling (arcade game). gren グレン 18:35, 23 February 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep Needs much work. [[image:VirtualSteve.png]] V i  r  tual  Steve  06:13, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
 * keep certainly more than one sentence there now. Jcuk 08:59, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per Jcuk -- S iva1979 Talk to me  16:14, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. It is much more than a one line article now.-- Dakota ~   °  19:34, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. per above. --Tone 21:54, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. It's a piece of Nintendo history. No, not NES history, history of the company itself. That's notable enough. Also, it's a piece of Punch-Out!! history. Parrothead1983 (talk) 02:30, 22 June 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.