Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arm hair fetishism


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. PhilKnight (talk) 13:52, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

Arm hair fetishism

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

I'm not sure of the notability of this topic, and many of the assertions in the article seem dubious. "As hairy arms are mostly seen in men, this could be thought as an exclusively homosexual attraction." So women can't have sexual fetishes? We're then told that most of this material features Latino women. Now, absent a history from this might be merely an OR observation, but this user has been engaged in some borderline racial and ethnic baiting in the past. deranged bulbasaur 16:52, 1 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Merge what we can and Redirect to Trichophilia. I reluctantly googled this, whilst looking over the shoulder before clicking search :P I did find that we have a hair fetish article which I have linked for the redirect. Would seem the most suitable thing for this. Sedd&sigma;n talk Editor Review 17:13, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, it's race-baiting. Also, non-notable. Fee Fi Foe Fum (talk) 19:53, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. No sourced content to be merged. Some part of me wants to say that paraphilias are inherently notable, but the search term does not appear common enough to warrant a redirect. - Eldereft (cont.) 16:47, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - no source, Google finds only this article - seems to be invented. JohnCD (talk) 16:18, 5 August 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.