Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Armaan Franklin


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Kichu🐘 Need any help? 05:03, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

Armaan Franklin

 * – ( View AfD View log )

There are a number of references about Armaan Franklin but all of them appeared WP:ROUTINE coverage. Fails WP:NCOLLATH, no major winning or participation. Chirota (talk) 01:21, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Chirota (talk) 01:21, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. Chirota (talk) 01:21, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Basketball-related deletion discussions. Chirota (talk) 01:21, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Chirota (talk) 01:21, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete a non-notable college basketball player.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:05, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep as he has been the primary subject of non-trivial media coverage such as this beyond merely a repeating of his statistics. Please see the relevant notability guideline here. Omnibus (talk) 16:09, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - as per nom, fails WP:NCOLLATH, and all the coverage appears to be routine.  Onel 5969  TT me 01:34, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Please review what is and is not routine coverage in sports. Neither this nor this are considered routine coverage per relevant guidelines. Specifically, "not every sporting event earns a feature article in the press and not every professional hopeful gains feature articles." This makes these examples non-routine coverage in both cases, because the game-winning shot in a nationally televised game earned a feature article for the event beyond a mere box score or statistics, and he later additionally gained a feature article solely about himself and his life (granted, after this nomination began). Omnibus (talk) 12:18, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Strong keep Easily passes WP:GNG with several indepth articles about the subject, such as from The Indianapolis Star, Richmond Times-Dispatch, SI.com, USA Today and The Athletic. Alvaldi (talk) 19:25, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 21:05, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep, per the SIGCOV found by Alvaldi, particularly the SI article which is the most independent and NCOLLATH-relevant of them (the others are more local or deal with his being a high school prospect). JoelleJay (talk) 00:49, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep USA Today and si.com are major publications that have in-depth covertage on him. Webmaster862 (talk) 04:56, 27 April 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.