Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Armada Hospital


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. A clear consensus following relisting. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 14:02, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Armada Hospital

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No indication of notability per WP:GNG; no reliable 3rd party sources have been provided and I've failed to find any significant coverage of this medical centre in my searches. Article appears to have been created solely for promotional purposes, seemingly by employees of the company concerned (though I've listed that concern at Conflict of interest/Noticeboard and I suggest we don't dwell on it here). └ UkPaolo/talk┐ 22:05, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions.  Human 3015   Let It Go    19:04, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:14, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Redirect or possibly selectively merge to Armada Group. Not notable in its own right. Joseph2302 (talk) 20:48, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:54, 18 January 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  20:52, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom Clearly not notable and fails WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 05:29, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete perhaps and mention at Aramada Group, instead of changing to link this there, because this is entirely questionably and therefore is also risked at restart attempts if open to it. Simply no signs of convincing notability, SwisterTwister   talk  03:35, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. It's already mentioned at the aticle on the group. There's no need for a redirect, because we don't redirect from every building a construction group builds.  DGG ( talk ) 06:59, 31 January 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.