Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Armed and Dangerous (2002 film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was    WP:SNOW delete. Fails WP:V; probable hoax. Eluchil404 (talk) 05:08, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

Armed and Dangerous (2002 film)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

No claims to notability - possibly a speedy delete based on lack of source I could find through Google (ie none), though Google searches difficult because of other films etc with the samename, and no director or actors given in the article. Brought here for your consideration Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 09:29, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. If IMDB doesn't list it, it simply doesn't exist. Seegoon (talk) 11:34, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. No mention at the British Film Institute either. Sarilox (talk) 14:24, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  —PC78 (talk) 15:38, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as likely hoax. I got to digging... and found the 1986 John Candy film and the 2003 video game. Then I found a 2004 Tylene Buck softcore porn film by that same name. Then I found that 2004 film being sold on Amazon as a 2002 film.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 10:50, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Er, dude, I don't think that's it..... Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 11:22, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm sure it is not (chuckle). Just offered my search and its results in support of my sense that this is a hoax.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 06:56, 9 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.